2026 Court of Criminal Appeals Place 4

Rotate phone sideways to see all candidates

Court & PlaceDemocratRepublicanNotes/Other

Audra Riley (D-Dallas)

Kevin Yeary* (R-Austin)

Candidate (L)
Candidate (G)
Candidate (I)

Campaign Mailing AddressP.O. Box 360124
Dallas, Texas 75336
Judge Yeary Campaign
PO Box 61
Wimberley, Texas 78676
Campaign Phone
Campaign Websitejudgerileycampaign.comjudgeyeary.com
Social Media Linkstwitter
Bar Card Number2404329100000012
Current OccupationJudge
Criminal District Court No. 3
Judge, Criminal Court of Appeals Place 4
since 2015
Years of Texas ResidencyNative Texan
JD School & YearTexas Southern University
2006
St. Mary's University
1991
Other EducationSam Houston State
BA Criminal Justice
St. Mary's University
Year of State Bar Licensure20061991
Legal Experience - NonjudicialDallas County District Attorney's Office

Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Bexar County 1998–2014
Assistant District Attorney, Harris County 1997-1998
Assistant District Attorney, Dallas County 1995-1996
Associate, Hedges & Walsh 1992-1995
Briefing Attorney, Bill M. White 1991-1992

Jury Trial Experience
Appellate Judicial ExperienceCriminal Court of Appeals, Judge since 2014
Other Judicial Experience
Board Certifications
Courts AdmittedUS Supreme Court
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Texas Western District Court
Honors and Awards
Prior Elections2024 General Election
Criminal District Court #3
Unopposed
2020 Texas General Election
Court of Criminal Appeals, Place 4
54.8%
Most Recent Bar Polls2026 - 1839 56%2026 - 1467 44%
Key Endorsements (Max 5)Governor Abbott
Texas Eagle Forum
Texas Alliance for Life
Mexican American Bar Association of Houston
C Club of Houston
Judicial Philosophy (Max 250 words)

Judge Yeary believes it is the job of the Legislature and the Governor to establish policy for our state. He believes that the Judicial Department of our government should exercise restraint when called upon to interpret the law. The Judiciary must be fiercely independent, but also cautious in the exercise of its immense power. This is particularly true with regard to judges serving on high courts.

 

Judges should be humble, understanding that they are not all-knowing or prescient. All judicial decisions must follow the actual law, found in our statutes and our constitutions. They must be driven by principle and commitment to the truth--about what the law requires and what it does not. Judges should not allow themselves to be fooled into believing that the people have given them the power to "make law." Opinions written by Judges are not "the LAW." It is true that judicial opinions can sometimes establish "RULES of decision" that are binding on lower courts, but those opinions should never be be considered to be more authoritative than the actual text of our statutes and our constitutions.

 

Judges must resist the temptation to be policy makers. If the people don't like the outcomes when the law is properly understood and applied, the people can petition their Legislative and Executive representatives for change. That is how our government is designed, and that is what our constitutions demand. The courts are the wrong place to seek changes in the law. 

Misc
Date Submitted by CandidateGathered from public sourcesGathered from public sources

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This